I think that if there is to be any "governing" allowed to take place, it should take place only under the watchful eyes of angry armed observers standing not more than 6 feet away. No governing should ever be permitted to take place behind metal detectors, or with armed security for the puppeticians being in the same building. The odds need to be leveled, and if one side has the power to destroy the lives of the other side, then the other side must have the same immediate power.
I think that would avoid a lot of the problems that seem to go along with puppeticians and bureaucrats. How many "laws" would end up being passed under those conditions? How many rights would be violated by government actions if that was a prerequisite for any government actions being engaged in? How often would "taxes" be increased?
Eventually it might even reduce the attraction that the sociopaths feel toward being elected to a government job.
Of course, the obvious conclusion is that there should never, ever, be any governing allowed. It isn't healthy or nice.
Nothing is sacred. Nobody is safe. Everything must go. Knowledge is free; it is the most valuable weapon a free people can have in the war against authority and hierarchy. I bloggregate from the miscellaneous battlefronts in this war. Unless we agree otherwise, I reserve the right to publish anything and everything you email me.
Patrick Lane, UVic commencement speech.
There are honourary degree holders. And then there's the poet Patrick Lane and his commencement speech at the University of Victoria, reprinted in the Times ...
Random #bitcoin Thoughts Worth Reading
Put some thinking regarding bitcoin up on Twitter. @johnrobb as a currency hedge, bitcoin's rise makes being a goldbug look pretty stupid. zerohedge.com/news...